From e87c88049148b3f3bd474745366a807889f17000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tedu <>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 08:07:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] remove incorrect statement. the standard *does* require
 calloc to check for overflow. stop talking about old broken systems, there's
 little use for such info.

---
 src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3 | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3 b/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3
index fadf9e24..32f36bd6 100644
--- a/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3
+++ b/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
 .\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
 .\" SUCH DAMAGE.
 .\"
-.\"	$OpenBSD: malloc.3,v 1.89 2015/01/08 03:41:14 deraadt Exp $
+.\"	$OpenBSD: malloc.3,v 1.90 2015/03/14 08:07:17 tedu Exp $
 .\"
-.Dd $Mdocdate: January 8 2015 $
+.Dd $Mdocdate: March 14 2015 $
 .Dt MALLOC 3
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -437,11 +437,6 @@ other conforming implementations may return
 .Dv NULL
 in this case.
 .Pp
-The standard does not require
-.Fn calloc
-to check for integer overflow,
-but most modern implementations provide this check.
-.Pp
 The
 .Ev MALLOC_OPTIONS
 environment variable, the file