Browse Source

pf should block the port range allocated by net.inet.tcp.baddynamic

for the X protocol instead of port 6000 only; this way pf provides
the same protection level to all X servers.
ok sthen@; "I am convinced that 6000-6010 is acceptable for blocking
in pf" deraadt@, "i'd thought of something similar" oga@
OPENBSD_4_6
sobrado 15 years ago
parent
commit
48f192013c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
  1. +2
    -2
      src/etc/pf.conf

+ 2
- 2
src/etc/pf.conf View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.43 2009/05/30 22:18:15 henning Exp $
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.44 2009/06/10 15:29:34 sobrado Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) for syntax and examples; this sample ruleset uses
# require-order to permit mixing of NAT/RDR and filter rules.
@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ pass # to establish keep-state
#block in quick from urpf-failed to any # use with care
# By default, do not permit remote connections to X11
block in on ! lo0 proto tcp to port 6000
block in on ! lo0 proto tcp to port 6000:6010

Loading…
Cancel
Save